Coop's art Reviews on Newgrounds

[Biological Catastrophe]

Interesting

This piece MUST BE VIEWED IN FULL SIZE to be properly appreciated. Tell the masses this in your comments, as you really can't see much until you press the full size button!

Right, that little rant over, I can certainly say that this piece is quite dark and I can see where you came to the conclusion about the name from - the shapes within do look like the cultivation of a culture of some sort of bacteria. The one main issue I have is how dark this piece is - making it slightly lighter will be able to give it such an improvement to the overall piece.

[Review Request Club]

HeavyTank responds:

Thanks a lot.

[Pyscadellic Birds]

*Psychedelic

It's an easy mistake to make, as that is certainly a difficult word to spell.

I like the way that the background looks like oil paints suspended in water and then disturbed by some sort of stick, just to move them slightly, before catching the colours on paper and allowing them to dry.

Finally, the detail work of the birds and the plant life reminds me of the drawing style of NEVR. It looks good and it just makes me feel that I'm looking up at the sky and seeing something weird going on in the atmosphere. I'm actually a little disturbed by the pseudo-hexagonal effect that you've got going in the bottom right corner. I'm not at all sure what that signifies.

[Review Request Club]

[Quarter Face Collab]

A little rushed

I think that you could have spent some time looking over this piece and smoothing out bits and pieces, just to make it look slightly moire human. The skull could be smoothed over, as that's how they tend to come out of the human head. I appreciate the colours would be like that if it had been left outside with no sunlight to bleach it, but the texture would be quite smooth, nonetheless.

Try looking at other skulls - one big piece of detail that you missed is the temple - just behind and above the eye socket on the side of the head, there is what can only be described as a dent. Try looking for some research material and you'll see what I mean. Adding this to the piece would certainly add to the detail and realism for me at least.

How big is this skull? That spider web looks incredibly detailed, to be used on a human sized eye socket. Perhaps you can reduce the amount of detail there, perhaps even adding the spider lazily stalking prey in one corner of the web?

I'm not sure what you're trying to convey in the background, but it's certainly different. An interesting colour scheme and something ominous looming from behind the skull...

[Review Request Club]

[Cliff Top Perch]

You''l get the hang of the coals

To be honest, I wasn't holding out too much expectation for this, when you said that you'd be using the charcoals for a picture. A couple of detail issues that presented themselves would be the front legs and the wings, where the knee / elbow join isn't very prominent and there doesn't seem to be any bone structure in the wing itself, which I would have liked to see.

The background looks a little simplistic, with almost childish looking mountains, being just single triangles jutting up out of the page. A few more rogue angles here and there would certainly help it to look more natural.

The sky looks better, with the stars being placed in a random pattern - did you try to recreate any night sky here, or just place them where you see fit?

[Review Request Club]

EchoRun responds:

Yes, the background is a bit plain. Partly because I was terrified of wrecking what I had already done with this. I think a bit of practice will cure that.

As for the wings, I did try to put some structure to them but not too much. As with bats, I tend to show less wing structure when the wing is at rest because a wing in flight or simply extended stretches the wing membrane showing of the frame of the wing. At rest, the lose and folded membrane hides this structure more. However, I don't think the scan did justice to this, as this is even more subtle then the original was.

Not sure what you mean about the joints though.

The stars were random. I'm getting better at doing random stars. ^.^

Thanks for the review. :)

[My girl =]]

A little sketchy

Personally, I think this needs a little polishing and tidying up before you can call this finished - the edges of the image look a little unfinished and untidy - perhaps some sort of inking would help get the definition sorted? Maybe scan it and then edit it with photoshop, where you can get greater detail?

I'd say more concentration on the shading as well, as in places, it looks smudged, which is a shame, as that does negatively affect your piece. I'd like to see some colour here, but not in this particular one - perhaps do a piece matching this and instead of shading with pencils, try coloured pencils, to see what a difference this makes.

[Review Request Club]

[Why So Serious?]

Good sketch

A little too unpolished for my liking - painting outside of the lines is something that you get taught not to do as a preschooler, to be honest.

I'm not sure about writing HA! all over the background of the piece, as there are plenty of things that you could have done with this, including even left it blank.

To be honest, I'd have loved to see what you made of the custom waistcoat that he wears, since that's quite a bit of detail work, so it would present a challenge, I'm sure!

Other than that, this would certainly suffice (when tidied up) to be a part of a comic book, relating to the Dark Knight.

[Review Request Club]

[Blue Eyed Dragon]

Very detailed

As I well know, this took some Herculean effort to draw the dragon scales on this piece. Please can you refrain from ranting so much about it, because it was most definitely worth it!

The blue eyes go against my own perception of dragons, but let's not go into that - they are certainly a captivating centrepiece that draws the viewer into the picture, before allowing them to look at the magnificence of the image.

The background is nice, but a few tweaks here and there with the rock face, you can perhaps give a more evident portrayal of three dimensions here - it looks a little too flat. The plant life is well detailed, but a nice touch in just blending the leaves into the background, leaving the soft focus effect there helps keep the main attention on the dragon itself.

When it comes to the dragon, I have two main concerns. The muzzle - there doesn't look like there was enough of a point between the nostrils for the actual nose-ridge there. The second concern is the shape of the dragon's right shoulder - do the scales really behave like that, or is this something that just has a tiny positioning issue.

[Review Request Club]

EchoRun responds:

The nose ridge... does it need a point? why? Plenty of animals have a ridge but a flat end to their nose! It is supposed to flatten out towards the end, maybe that just isn't showing through enough? That is what you are on about, right?

The shoulder is a bit of a mixed thing, drawn from a few sources, reptile, animal, fiction, and probably a a little human in there too. For the scales I have drawn from the plates on some of the more heavily armoured reptiles, like the armadillo lizard and the giant sungazer lizard (I REALLY REALLY want one of those!! So beautiful... *sigh*). I'm not too happy with how it turned out, mostly because of his back, I think I needed more of that on show to make it look better. Oh well.

The background... well, I am still working on those in general.

Thanks for the review. :)

[may I take yours?]

Etch-a-sketch?

The background looks better in this one, because the red, orange and yellow have been blended, rather than separated with black lines - it's a trifle uniform, but that can easily be remedied.

The detail of the old man needs to be worked on here - you seem too eager to publish and don't spend enough time touching up the fine detail. The speech bubble is done more harm than good by the fact that the Y in yours is backwards and the I should be a capital letter.

A lack of hands and feet really signals your intention to give in and not submit the finished piece. Please pay attention to the details, add a splash of colour to the characters and then try submitting, it will make such a difference.

[Review Request Club]

Silent-G responds:

were you there? did you see what he looked like? no, I don't think so, you didn't follow me in my eight wheeler and jump the multiple canyons and dunes. You didn't camp with the Monchoookaa tribe, you didn't smoke the Lablayay leafs, and you sure as hell didn't have sex with Tanoonoo. So don't tell me what he looked like, and don't tell me I gave in. I never gave in, and I never gave up, I gave it my all and if that's not good enough well then you can pay the child support you alligator testicle pillow. thanks for the review.

[help me out]

Tidy it up

I think that this piece is in desperate need of tidying up - the black line between the sky and land should never have been there in the first place - try blending the colours together, to give an impression of a landscape where grasses wave in the breeze, for example.

The cloudscape is a decent effort, I'll give you that - While it could use the attention to detail that a lot of this image shows, you have got that certain abstract feel to it, which is nice.

Finally, the three figures - try making their eyes look less like random scribbles and if you're trying to make them look perfectly round, spend some time making it look round. If not, at least fill them in with black, as it will look much better.

They have coloured flowers on their lapels, so why not give their suits some colour as well? No self-respecting person ever wears a white suit with white shirt and black tie. At least some colour in the shirt should help.

Lastly, you need to sort their mouths out - the teeth don't follow all the way to the lips - perhaps drawing some gums would help, plus it's a colour opportunity. Also, I've just noticed the copy / paste / flip that you've done here - it's a cheat and does your work no justice.

[Review Request Club]

Silent-G responds:

you're literally being literally literal mister little literal literature licker. thanks for the literal review, literally.

[feel what I feel]

Too much writing

If you're going to do a submission that's based around writing, I would suggest that you get yourself a lot more practice with drawing the fonts - tidy them up and make some sort of billboard out of it, with the foreground taken up with the massively happy chap, that's doing drugs.

A quick change from the ultimately negative approach, shows that the colour scheme is nice, though I would assume that the reason that you've displayed the colours on one side as monochrome and the other as Technicolour, due to the symbolism, that without drugs, life is dull. It's not the case, trust me on this ;)

I'd recommend that you spend some time tidying up the image itself - smoke needs to be more than just a few lines rising up the page, the happy chap's head isn't quite completely satisfying in shape - these sorts of thing make all the difference.

[Review Request Club]

Silent-G responds:

I wasn't trying to base this submission around writing, it just happens to be there. and surprisingly, you're the first person to ever dislike my hand writing. You also assumed that everything in this picture was a drug reference, which I can understand, but is in fact not the case. Who ever said the lines rising from his head were supposed to be smoke? You're making way too many assumptions. Thanks for the review anyway.